USPTO serial 76466370
O-N-L-Y JEANS CO.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with O-N-L-Y JEANS CO.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Port Washington, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher J. Bischoff
CHRISTOPHER J BISCHOFF BISCHOFF & ASSOCIATES LTD1731 CENTRAL STEVANSTON, IL 60201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely sweat pants and sweat shirts, sweat shorts, gym shorts, tops, jackets, shirts, sport, shirts, t-shirts, sweaters, head wear, hats, caps, headbands, sweat bands, wrist bands, athletic uniforms, Bermuda shorts, body suits, sport coats, suits, gym suits, hoods, jerseys, jogging suits, jumpers, jump suits, leggings, pants, slacks, pantsuits, boxer shorts, warm-up suits, sweat suits, turtleneck sweaters, dresses, denim pants, v-neck sweaters, sweat socks, uniforms, clothing wraps, bathing suits, socks, gloves, underwear, pajamas, and undershirts | ACTIVE | Dec 2, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 28, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |