Drawing for CLOWNING AROUND

USPTO serial 76466784

CLOWNING AROUND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLOWNING AROUND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Capone

John Capone GTECH, Corporate Headquaters10 Memorial BlvdProvidence, RI 02903UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Gaming equipment, namely gaming machines, electric and electronic gaming and gambling machines; gaming machines; gaming machines featuring slot machine type games via video displays; coin-operated gaming equipment, namely, gambling machines, slot machines, casino gambling machines; electronic slot machines incorporating operating software; electric, electronic, electromechanical and electro pneumatic sporting activities and game playing simulators; multi-user and networked gaming, amusement and gambling apparatus and machines, namely, multi-station simulators, apparatus and devices, namely, slot machines; multi-user and networked gaming and gambling machines, namely, multi-station simulators; apparatus, devices, machines and simulators arranged for operation upon payment by means of coins, bank notes, tokens, magnetic strip cards and similar money surrogate carriers; computer video game machines and video and computer game apparatus and instruments, namely, video game machines for use with televisions and cathode ray terminals; video and computer game machines for use with televisions; pre-recorded magnetic data carriers featuring recorded programs for use with gambling, amusement and gambling apparatus, devices and machines; video game cartridges and discs; money exchange apparatus, namely, token, jeton providing token dispensing machines; vending machines featuring scratch-off lottery game cards; firmware and software featuring action films and simulated games for use in electric and electronic game, amusement and gambling apparatus, devices and machines; firmware and computer operating software for electric and electronic game, amusement and gambling apparatus, devices and machines; firmware and software providing electronic gaming machines and software for use in connection therewith or providing electronic gaming machines and computer game software; data recording apparatus, namely, magnetic disc drives, magnetic tape drives and semiconductor memory for use with electric and electronic games, amusement and gambling apparatus, devices and machines; vending machines featuring CD ROM games, cassette games, cartridge games, video games; data collection and data processing systems, namely, digital tape recorders, video game recorders, video monitors, circuit boards, video game controllers, network server units, display terminal, data entry consoles for use in games, amusement and gambling apparatus, devices and machines; data collection and data processing systems, namely, digital tape recordsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 12, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 12, 2005DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 13, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 8, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 16, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 18, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 1, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance