USPTO serial 76466904
INTOUCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTOUCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CLAUDIA RAST
CLAUDIA RAST DOMINO'S FARMS LOBBY EPEAR SPERLING EGGAN & MUSKOVITZ PC24 FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT DRANN ARBOR, MI 48105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing online interactive business consultation services via a Web site, featuring statistical market analysis, market analysis, market research and business consultation in the field of improving the quality customer service, business operations and workplace satisfaction | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |