USPTO serial 76467009
GENIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GENIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mount Olive, NJ
Mount Olive, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna J. Bunton
DONNA J BUNTON NIXON & VANDERHYE PC11TH FL901 N GLEBE RDARLINGTON, VA 22203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROVIDING ONLINE DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, ACCESSIBLE VIA INTERNET, INTRANET OR EXTRANET, IN THE FIELD OF COATINGS, AUTOMOTIVE COATINGS AND FINISHING PRODUCTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | PROVIDING CUSTOMIZED E-MAIL COMMUNICATION SERVICES FOR USE AS A COLLABORATION TOOL ACCESSIBLE VIA INTERNET, INTRANET OR EXTRANET, IN THE FIELD OF COATINGS, AUTOMOTIVE COATINGS AND FINISHING PRODUCTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | COMPUTER PORTAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING CUSTOMIZED ONLINE PORTAL WEB PAGES FEATURING USER-DEFINED INFORMATION AND LINKS TO RELATED APPLICATIONS AND PROJECT COLLABORATION, ALL IN THE FIELD OF COATINGS, AUTOMOTIVE COATINGS AND FINISHING PRODUCTS, ALL ACCESSIBLE VIA INTERNET, INTRANET OR EXTRANET | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | PROVIDING INTERACTIVE ONLINE PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, BROCHURES, PAMPHLETS, MAGAZINES, MANUALS AND BOOKS IN THE FIELD OF COATINGS, AUTOMOTIVE COATINGS AND FINISHING PRODUCTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BASF Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by BASF Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named GENIE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 16, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |