USPTO serial 76467238
COLOURFX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COLOURFX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
The Health Company Europe Limited
Surrey GU10 4PL England, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES H DONOIAN
JAMES H DONOIAN GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | NON-MEDICATED TOILET PREPARATIONS; COSMETICS; NON-MEDICATED PREPARATIONS ALL FOR THE CARE OF SKIN, HAIR AND SCALP; PRODUCTS FOR PERSONAL HYGIENE AND BEAUTY CARE; SOAPS; DEPILATORY PRODUCTS; BATH HERBS; ETHEREAL OILS; ESSENTIAL OILS; BATH OILS; MASSAGE OILS; PERFUMERIES AND PERFUMERY PRODUCTS; HAND CREAMS, BODY LOTIONS, AROMATIC SUBSTANCES AND FRAGRANCE PREPARATIONS; PERFUMED AIR FRESHENERS AND SPRAYS; PERSONAL DEODORANTS; EAU DE COLOGNE, DENTIFRICES, TALCUM POWDER; SMALL DOMESTIC UTENSILS AND CONTAINERS FOR CULINARY OR HOUSEHOLD USE; COMBS AND COMB CASES, SPONGES, BRUSHES; ARTICLES FOR CLEANING PURPOSES; GLASSWARE, PORCELAIN AND EARTHENWARE; CHINA ORNAMENTS; WORKS OF ART, BUSTS, STATUES AND STATUETTES OF PORCELAIN, TERRACOTTA OR GLASS; CANDLE-HOLDERS; PERFUME VAPORISERS AND PERFUME BURNERS; POWDER COMPACTS AND POWDER PUFFS; HAIR SALON AND BEAUTY SALON SERVICES; MANICURE, PEDICURE, MASSAGE, REFLEXOLOGY, AROMATHERAPY, ELECTROLYSIS, WAXING, TINTING, MAKE-UP, GROOMING, COLOUR DIAGNOSIS AND BODY TREATMENT SERVICES; SERVICES RELATING TO PERSONAL APPEARANCE, WELL-BEING AND LIFESTYLE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |