USPTO serial 76467342
W
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with W?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN W. FEINGOLD
STEPHEN W FEINGOLD PITNEY, HARDINSEVEN TIMES SQNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, THE PURCHASE OF RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGES FOR OTHERS AND THE ISSUANCE OF MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES | ABANDONED | Jul 18, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 14, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 11, 2003 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |