USPTO serial 76467756
SUPERSTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHEFFIELD, SHARI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPERSTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Artz
JOHN S ARTZ ARTZ & ARTZ, PC28333 TELEGRAPH RD STE 250SOUTHFIELD, MI 48034UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | PROTECTIVE LACROSSE EQUIPMENT, NAMELY GLOVES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |