Drawing for THE GREAT AMERICAN TRANSFORMATION

USPTO serial 76467935

THE GREAT AMERICAN TRANSFORMATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE GREAT AMERICAN TRANSFORMATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa A. Osman

LISA A OSMAN DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP370 17TH ST STE 4700DENVER, CO 80202-5647UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Prerecorded audio and video tapes on nutrition, health, weight loss, exercise, body building and wellnessACTIVE—
016Books, newsletters, pamphlets, magazines and brochures having to do with nutrition, health, weight loss, exercise, bodybuilding and wellnessACTIVE—
041Training and educational services, namely, conducting nationwide programs, seminars and conferences in the field of nutrition, health, weight loss, exercise, bodybuilding and wellness, and distributing written materials and prerecorded audio and video tapes, in connection therewithACTIVE—
044Food, nutrition and weight loss counseling conducted in the form of national campaign in the fields of nutrition, health, weight loss, exercise, bodybuilding and wellness to eliminate obesity by securing commitments from participants to lose weight and improve their healthACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 31, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 14, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 14, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 14, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 24, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 24, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 19, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 19, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 19, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 21, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 2, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2005PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Feb 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 29, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2005PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Nov 25, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 27, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 26, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 25, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 25, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 2, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 30, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 16, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance