USPTO serial 76468373
MAXIM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, WANDA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAXIM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London W1R 5LD, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur J. Jacobs
ARTHUR J JACOBS JACOBS, DEBRAUWERE & DEHN LLP445 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Prepared frozen foods and dinners, both meatless and containing meat | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 18, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |