Drawing for ABDS

USPTO serial 76468508

ABDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ABDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elisabeth A. Langworthy

ELISABETH A LANGWORTHY SUTHERLAND, ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP1275 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2415UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for automating a process for authentication of identity in connection with the issuance and management of private and public keys used for digital signature or encryption of digital communications, or authentication of a digital signature in an electronic transaction or communication, over a computer networkACTIVE
042development, integration, and operation of computer systems to support issuance and management of public keys and private keys for the use of creating digital signatures and verifying digital signatures in account based business processes and application environmentsACTIVE
045Computer services, namely, providing authentication of identity and authentication of a digital communication or a digital signature in an electronic transaction over a computer network; Providing user authentication services in e-commerce and electronic transactions, namely, authenticating, maintaining, and storing public encryption keys for authentication and verification of digital signatures created in integrated computer circuits or by software which is in mobile phones, smart cards, USB dongles, computers, computer networks and other account based-business processes and application environmentsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 2, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 9, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 20, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 15, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 11, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jun 4, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 30, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 1, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance