USPTO serial 76468664
MAXIM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAXIM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William T. Ellis
WILLIAM T ELLIS WASHINGTON HARBOURFOLEY & LARDNER3000 K ST NW STE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5143Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | light curing lamp system for curing printing press inks comprised of high voltage power supply system, control panel to operate system, exhaust plenum that extracts fumes out of an indoor plant or printing facility, blower fan and directional tubing that remove the fumes directly from the surface of the printed substrate on tile press, a lamp housing mounted directly on each print station of the printing press that has mirrors mounted in specific directional patterns to allow light rays to be pointed directly on the printed substrate, and a lamp mount inside each housing positioned in relation to a mirror to obtain the maximum curing affect of the ink or coating on the printed substrate | ACTIVE | Nov 16, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |