USPTO serial 76468894
XDP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3643907Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 23, 2009
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with XDP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DURHAM, NC
DURHAM, NC
Princeton, NJ
Princeton, NJ
PRINCETON, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leon Medzhibovsky
Leon Medzhibovsky FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P.666 FIFTH AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic communication hardware and software applications for enabling computer users to connect to remote computers via internet or intranet using communication protocol standards that enable secure access to remote computers, all of the above goods excluding analog matrix switching systems for keyboards, video and mice | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 24, 2004 |
| 035 | Licensing of proprietary technology in the field of protocol standards that enable secure access to remote computers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 24, 2004 |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, providing communication protocol standards that enable secure access to remote computers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 24, 2004 |
| 042 | Consulting and technology licensing services, namely, the development and licensing of intellectual property relating to communication protocol standards that enable secure access to remote computers, and consulting services relating to the implementation, use and deployment of that technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 24, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SIMTONE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SIMTONE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Xtend, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Xtend, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by XDS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named XDP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 19, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2009 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | NAUD | SU - NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 23, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 10, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 25, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |