Drawing for MEDRESPONSE

USPTO serial 76469292

MEDRESPONSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARTY, GEORGIA
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEDRESPONSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laura M. Lloyd

NEIL F MARTIN GORDON & REES LLP101 W BROADWAY STE 1600SAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Providing information concerning health insurance via an automated telephone response systemABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2007MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 28, 2007ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 27, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 8, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 8, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 3, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 9, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 9, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 9, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 8, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 8, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 8, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 11, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 11, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 11, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 8, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 16, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 6, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 17, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 31, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 21, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 30, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance