USPTO serial 76469299
SUGAR DAD D
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUGAR DAD D?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated skin care products, namely, cleansing lotion, skin conditioner and moisturizer, facial cleansers, facial creams, facial scrubs; non-medicated body care products, namely, body creams and lotions, body oil, body scrubs, massage lotion; non-medicated bath products, namely, bath gel, bath oil, bubble bath, bath salts, body washes, shower gel, non-medicated body soaks; non-medicated cosmetics, namely, soaps; non-medicated scented products, namely, essential oils for personal use, essential oils for use in the manufacture of scented products | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |