USPTO serial 76469431
POTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Daejeon-City, KR
Daejeon-City, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ADAM C. VOLENTINE
ADAM C VOLENTINE VOLENTINE FRANCOS & WHITT PLLC11951 FREEDOM DR STE 1260RESTON, VA 20190UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | OPHTHALMOLOGY MEDICAL DEVICES, NAMELY, AUTO REFRACTOMETER, AUTO LENSMETER, CHART PROJECTOR, MIRROR CHART, PHOROPTOR, SLIT LAMP, TONOMETER, RETINAL CAMERA, AND FUDUS CAMERA | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 5, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 7, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |