Drawing for DURA-LITE

USPTO serial 76469460

DURA-LITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DURA-LITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas S. Johnson

DOUGLAS S JOHNSON DENNISON ASSOCIATES133 RICHMOND ST W STE 301TORONTO, ON M5H 2L7CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Plastic storage boxesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 15, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 6, 2005LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Jul 6, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 28, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 9, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 5, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 20, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance