Drawing for EATON LEONARD

USPTO serial 76469744

EATON LEONARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EATON LEONARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Olivia Goodkin

OLIVIA GOODKIN RUTTER HOBBS & DAVIDOFF INCORPORATEDSTE 1700, 1901 AVE OF THE STARSLOS ANGELES, C 90067,

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Metal tube bending machinesABANDONEDDec 17, 1974
009Equipment for the measurement of tubes formed by tube bending machines, namely an integrated unit with a sensor and associated software to provide data to enable analysis of tube bending anglesABANDONEDDec 12, 1973
037Repair and maintenance of metal tube bending machines and measuring equipment for bent tubes and surfacesABANDONEDDec 17, 1974

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 23, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 23, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 23, 2006OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Nov 10, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 9, 2004OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 2, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 13, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 8, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 20, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 16, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 7, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 24, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance