USPTO serial 76470375
EMERGENCY BILLING SERVICES, INC. PERFECTING THE BUSINESS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 27, 2005
- Examiner
- STOKOLS, GWEN P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EMERGENCY BILLING SERVICES, INC. PERFECTING THE BUSINESS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Emergency Billing Services, Inc.
Lake Milton, OH
Emergency Billing Services, Inc.
Lake Milton, OH
Emergency Billing Services, Inc.
Lake Milton, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
T. Robert Bricker
T. ROBERT BRICKER, LLC4531 BELMONT AVEYOUNGSTOWN, OH 44505UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Billing services for medical and emergency medical providers; providing coding of medical records for billing purposes for medical and emergency providers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Emergency Billing Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Emergency Billing Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Emergency Billing Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named EMERGENCY BILLING SERVICES, INC. PERFECTING THE BUSINESS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 9, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |