USPTO serial 76470545
INSTITUTE FOR STRATEGY AND SUPPLY MANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INSTITUTE FOR STRATEGY AND SUPPLY MANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Abtwill / St. Gallen St. Gallen, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DIRK BOEHMANN
RHEINALLEE 18BONN NRW, 53173GERMAN DEMOCRATICGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed matter, namely brochures, newsletters, magazines, series of non-fiction books, pamphlets, study guides, handbooks and directories, all in the field of strategic management, namely, assistance in the field of corporate strategy, general management, namely, planning and controlling of companies, purchasing, procurement, supply management and supply chain management | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business research and development in the field of strategic management, namely, providing assistance in the field of corporate strategy; general management, namely, planning and controlling of companies, purchasing, procurement, supply management and supply chain management | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, arranging and conducting seminars, classes and lectures in the field of strategic management, namely, assistance in the field of corporate strategy; general management, namely, planning and controlling of companies, purchasing, procurement, supply management and supply chain management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jahns, Christopher
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named INSTITUTE FOR STRATEGY AND SUPPLY MANAGEMENT
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2004 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |