USPTO serial 76470958
CANDY FOR HAIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CANDY FOR HAIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS, MEN, NAMELY, PANTS, DENIM JEANS, OVERALLS, SHORTS, SHIRT, T-SHIRTS, BLOUSES, SKIRTS, DRESSES, SWEATER, JACKETS AND COORDINATED JACKETS, IN ALL FABRICATIONS AND WEIGHTS, VEST, T-SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRT, SWEATPANTS, SWIMWEAR, CAPS, HEADBANDS, HATS, BELTS, UNDERWEAR, SOCKS, SLEEPWEAR, BATHROBES, AND OUTERWEAR IN ALL FABRICATIONS AND WEIGHTS,NAMELY, CLOTH, DENIM, WOOL, LEATHER AND SUEDE, JACKETS, TOPCOATS, VESTS, CAR COATS, COORDINATED JACKETS; RAINWEAR NAMELY WIND AND WATER RESISTANT JACKETS, TOP COATS, RAIN COATS; HEADWEAR; HATS, GLOVES, SCARVES, AND FOOTWEAR; SHOES, TENNIS SHOES, SANDALS AND BOOTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |