USPTO serial 76471497
SUREPATH MULTIPLEXER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUREPATH MULTIPLEXER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristofer E. Halvorson
KRISTOFER E HALVORSON THEHALVORSON LAW FIRM1757 E BASELINE RD STE 130GILBERT, AZ 85233UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | optical components namely modules employing planar integrated circuits for use in optical fiber telecommunication systems, sub-systems employing planar integrated circuits for use in optical fiber telecommunication systems, modules employing hybrid integrated circuits for use in optical fiber telecommunication systems, sub-systems employing hybrid integrated circuits for use in optical fiber telecommunication systems modules, control systems for use with optical components, packaging for packaging of optical components, fiber optic components for use in metropolitan networks, fiber optic components for use in long haul networks, fiber optic components for use in submarine networks, and fiber optic components for use in access networks, fiber optic components for use in test and measurement of optical communication network equipment; optical modules for providing multiplexer/demultiplexer functionality for optical signals with additional equalizing functions; optical modules for providing multiplexer/demultiplexer functionality for optical signals without additional equalizing functions; optical sub-systems for providing multiplexer/demultiplexer functionality for optical signals with additional equalizing functions; optical sub-systems for providing multiplexer/demultiplexer functionality for optical signals without additional equalizing functions; optical modules for providing multiplexer/demultiplexer functionality for optical signals with additional monitoring functions; optical modules for providing multiplexer/demultiplexer functionality for optical signals without additional monitoring functions; optical sub-systems for providing multiplexer/demultiplexer functionality for optical signals with additional monitoring functions; optical sub-systems for providing multiplexer/demultiplexer functionality for optical signals without additional monitoring functions; optical modules for providing multiplexer/demultiplexer functionality for optical signals with additional analysis functions; optical modules for providing multiplexer/demultiplexer functionality for optical signals without additional analysis functions; optical sub-systems for providing multiplexer/demultiplexer functionality for optical signals with additional analysis functions; and optical sub-systems for providing multiplexer/demultiplexer functionality for optical signals without additional analysis functions | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Diagnostic services namely testing and measurement of fiber optic components | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |