USPTO serial 76472330
EVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
20121 - Milano, IT
20121 - Milano, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James V. Costigan,
James V. Costigan HEDMAN & COSTIGAN, P.C.1230 Avenue of the Americas, 7th FloorNew York, NY 10020UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely, perfumes; solid perfumes; personal deodorants; deodorant soaps; liquid soaps; toilet soaps; personal hygiene spray deodorant; bath foams; toothpaste; ordinary mouthwash; hair shampoo; hair lotions; hair strengthening lotions; essential oils for personal use; permanent wave preparations; gels, namely, hair gel; bath gel; shower gel; hair dyes; face creams; skin toning fluids; exfoliating cream; perfuming cleansing bath oil; shower oil for sensitive skin; cellulite, stretch marks, toning-up massage cream; mascara; eye-liners; eye-shadows; make-up pencils; face powders; lip sticks; skin-toning up and nourishing fluid cream; body creams; nail varnishes, namely, nail hardeners; nail polish removers; sun tanning oils and creams; preshave and after-shave lotions and gels; cream and foam shaving soap; sun milk with different protection grades; self-tanning cream for face and body; sun tanning preparation in liquid form | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |