USPTO serial 76472712
Serial No. 76472712
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- PHOTOCOMP COORDINATOR
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 76472712?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Clemente, CA
San Clemente, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lydie Arthos Hudson
LYDIE ARTHOS HUDSON LATHROP & CLARK LLP740 REGENT ST STE 400MADISON, WI 53715UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed matter, namely charts, labels, decorated printer paper, decorated notepads and note paper, and printed sheets of clip art; printed publications, namely, periodicals, catalogues, magazines, books, abstracts, newsletters and bulletins featuring information on children's educational materials; stationery; decals; printed instructional and teaching materials featuring information on early childhood and middle school education, early childhood development, children's activities, social studies, language arts, math, reading and science; paper goods, namely decorated printer paper and decorated note paper; cardboard goods namely, bulletin boards featuring social studies topics and images | ABANDONED | Sep 20, 1979 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2005 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| May 5, 2005 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 1, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |