USPTO serial 76472767
PROPHYLANTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, JEFFERY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROPHYLANTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bloomfield, NJ
Bloomfield, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES I CHARNE
JAMES I CHARNE LAW OFFICES JAMES I CHARNE425 IDAHO AVE UNIT N 9SANTA MONICA, CA 90403-2666UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | SERIES OF BOOKS IN THE FIELD OF HUMOR | ACTIVE | Oct 10, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 5, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 23, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |