USPTO serial 76473436
NUTTY DELICIOUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3115400Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 11, 2006
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NUTTY DELICIOUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Burlington, Ontario, CA
Burlington, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori K. Hall
Lori K. Hall GowlingsOne Main Street WestHamilton, L8P 4Z5CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Cookies | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 30, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 27, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 27, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 24, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2005 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |