USPTO serial 76473488
HUMAN FRUITS & PASSION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3090614Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 9, 2006
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HUMAN FRUITS & PASSION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Candiac Quebec, CA
LE GROUPE FRUITS & PASSION INC./THE FRUITS & PASSION GROUP INC.
CANDIAC, QUEBEC, CA
Other trademarks owned by LE GROUPE FRUITS & PASSION INC./THE FRUITS & PASSION GROUP INC.
LE GROUPE FRUITS & PASSION INC./THE FRUITS & PASSION GROUP INC.
CANDIAC, QUEBEC, CA
Other trademarks owned by LE GROUPE FRUITS & PASSION INC./THE FRUITS & PASSION GROUP INC.
LE GROUPE FRUITS & PASSION INC./THE FRUITS & PASSION GROUP INC.
CANDIAC, QUEBEC, CA
Other trademarks owned by LE GROUPE FRUITS & PASSION INC./THE FRUITS & PASSION GROUP INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John M. Cone
John M. Cone Hitchcock Evert LLPPO Box 131709Dallas, TX 75313-1709UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SHOWER GELS, SOAP, FOAMING BATH CREAM, MASSAGE OIL, BODY MILK LOTION, TALCUM POWDER, PERSONAL POWDER DEODORANT, HAND SOAP, BATH SEA SALTS, BATH OIL, BODY CREAM, NON-MEDICATED LIP BALM, HAND CREAM, EAU DE TOILETTE, MOISTURIZING BODY MILK, SHOWER GEL CREAM, AFTER SHAVE LOTION, SHAVING CREAM, PERSONAL DEODORANT, GEL SKIN SCRUB, ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE, BODY SHAMPOO, NON-MEDICATED EYE CONTOUR CREAM, FACIAL MASK, SKIN CLEANSING MILK, SKIN CLEANSING GEL, SKIN REGENERATING TONERS, HAIR SHAMPOO, HAIR MOISTURIZERS, HAIR CONDITIONERS, SUN SCREEN LOTION, AFTER-SUN NEUTRALIZING SKIN LOTION, AFTER-SUN REGENERATING SKIN BUTTER, NON-MEDICATED MOISTURIZING DEODORANT FOOT CREAM, NON-MEDICATED CLEANSING AND SOOTHING FOOT BATH, EXFOLIATING FOOT CREAM, NON-MEDICATED REFRESHING AND DEODORANT FOOT POWDER; POTPOURRI, PERFUMED SACHET, EYE COMPRESSES FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES, PERFUMED BURNER OILS FOR USE AS ROOM FRAGRANCES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 24, 2003 |
| 004 | CANDLES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 24, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HURTEAU & ASSOCIES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LE GROUPE FRUITS & PASSION INC./THE FRUITS & PASSION GROUP INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LE GROUPE FRUITS & PASSION INC./THE FRUITS & PASSION GROUP INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LE GROUPE FRUITS & PASSION INC./THE FRUITS & PASSION GROUP INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Similar marks named HUMAN FRUITS & PASSION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 9, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 18, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |