USPTO serial 76473781
URBAN SKOOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with URBAN SKOOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
St. Laurent, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George R. Mosher
GEORGE R MOSHER BROOKS & KUSHMAN PC1000 TOWN CTRTWENTY-SECOND FLSOUTHFIELD, MI 48075Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | TRAVEL ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, KNAPSACKS, BRIEFCASES, LUGGAGE AND HANDBAGS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, COATS, JEANS, SWEATERS, T-SHIRTS, BLOUSES, SHIRTS, SHORTS, GLOVES AND RAINCOATS; NIGHTWEAR, NAMELY, PAJAMAS, GOWNS, NIGHTSHIRTS, PEIGNOIR SETS, SLIPS, ROBES, CAMISOLES, BRA SETS AND LINGERIE SETS; FOOTWEAR, NAMELY, ATHLETIC, CASUAL AND DRESS SHOES, BOOTS, SANDALS AND SLIPPERS; AND HEADWEAR, NAMELY, KNIT AND WOVEN HATS, EAR MUFFS AND SCARVES | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | HAIR ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, BANDS, CLIPS, BARRETTES AND BOWS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |