Drawing for INSPIRE BY COUNTRY COACH

USPTO serial 76473972

INSPIRE BY COUNTRY COACH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INSPIRE BY COUNTRY COACH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alan C. Rose

Joel D. Voelzke Intellectual Property Law Office of Joel D. Voelzk24772 Saddle Peak RoadMalibu, CA 90265UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Recreational vehicles, namely motor homesACTIVEApr 1, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 3, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2006MAB7ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Jan 30, 2006ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Jun 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2005CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2005SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 4, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 4, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 4, 2005EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 4, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 15, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 28, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 23, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 3, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 29, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 29, 2003CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance