Drawing for URBAN SKOOL

USPTO serial 76474121

URBAN SKOOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with URBAN SKOOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George R. Mosher

GEORGE R MOSHER BROOKS & KUSHMAN PC1000 TOWN CTR 22ND FLSOUTHFIELD, MI 48075UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025PANTS AND JACKETSACTIVEAug 26, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 2, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 13, 2007CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 12, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 11, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 11, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 9, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 2, 2006CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 1, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 30, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 30, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 30, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 29, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 20, 2004CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 18, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 16, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 28, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance