Drawing for CSS-NET

USPTO serial 76474481

CSS-NET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CSS-NET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph R. Dreitler

Joseph R. Dreitler Bricker & Eckler LLP100 S. Third St.Columbus, OH 43215UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Dissemination of advertising for others via the internet; advertising agencies, namely, promoting the services of airplane industry, construction industry and land vehicles industry through the distribution of printed and audio promotional materials and by rendering sales promotion advice; advertising services, namely providing advertising space in a periodical; business management and consultation; e-commerce business transaction consulting; commercial information in the field of commodity sales by e-commerce transaction; business management of hotels for othersACTIVE—
042Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others and construction and editing of information to computer databases relating to e-commerce business transactionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 5, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 5, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 5, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 11, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 23, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 11, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 30, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 30, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 7, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 7, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 7, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 20, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 20, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 20, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 28, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 8, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 16, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 11, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 9, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 9, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 29, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance