USPTO serial 76474544
ARS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3093552Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 16, 2006
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ARS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PLACITAS, NM
PLACITAS, NM
North American Alliance L.L.C.
Placitas, NM
North American Alliance L.L.C.
Placitas, NM
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
V. Gerald Grafe
V. Gerald Grafe The Grafe Law Office, P.C.P.O. Box 2689Corrales, NM 87048UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Water treatment equipment, namely, electrofloculation treatment units; components thereof, namely, water receptacles, water flow control devices, electrodes, and filters; and associated supplies, namely, electrodes and filters | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 10, 2005 |
| 040 | Removal of contaminants from water to the order and specification of others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 10, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ARS USA LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ARS USA LLC
- Other trademarks owned by North American Alliance L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by North American Alliance L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named ARS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 5, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 3, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 12, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 4, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |