CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for DIMAS

USPTO serial 76474735

DIMAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3081128Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 18, 2006
Examiner
BOAGNI, MARY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with DIMAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald M. Kachmarik

Ronald M. Kachmarik Pearne & Gordon LLP1801 East 9th StreetSuite 1200Cleveland, OH 44114-3108

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007POWER OPERATED SAWS, NAMELY FLAT SAWS, RANDOM CRACK SAWS, WALL SAWS, FLOOR SAWS, DIAMOND WIRE SAWS, TILE SAWS, TILE/STONE SAWS, BRICK SAWS FOR CUTTING ASPHALT, TILE, MASONRY, STONE, REFRACTORY AND PRESTRESS CONCRETE; POWER OPERATED GROOVERS AND TEXTURES FOR PAVEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION APPLICATION, CORE DRILLING MACHINES; HYDRAULIC POWER PACKS FOR PROVIDING PORTABLE SOURCE OF POWER FOR TOOLS; BLADES FOR ALL THE AFOREMENTIONED TOOLS, NAMELY, DIAMOND SAW BLADES, LASER WELDED BLADES; DIAMOND CORE BITS AND POWER OPERATED GRINDING PLATES FOR THE AFORESAID POWER TOOLS, POWER OPERATED GRINDING WHEELS, POWER OPERATED CUTTERS FOR CUTTING ASPHALT, TILE, MASONRY, STONE, REFRACTORY AND PRESTRESS CONCRETE, HAND HELD POWER OPERATED CUTTERS; BLADES AND WIRES AS PARTS OF POWER SAWS, NAMELY SEGMENTED BLADES FOR CUTTING APPLICATIONS AND DIAMOND WIRES USED FOR CUTTING APPLICATIONSSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDNov 30, 1982

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2012C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Dec 18, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 18, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 7, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 2, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 26, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 26, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 7, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 22, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 22, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 29, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 9, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance