Drawing for NEVER BROKE

USPTO serial 76474831

NEVER BROKE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEVER BROKE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maury Winkler

MAURY WINKLER THE WINKLER LAW FIRM60 PARK PL STE 1104NEWARK, NJ 07102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Record Production, Music ProductionACTIVEDec 1, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2006PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Dec 22, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 22, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 25, 2005CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 25, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 7, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 2, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 1, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 1, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
May 15, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance