USPTO serial 76474884
O
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with O?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Fife KY11 8GR, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norm D. St. Landau, Esq.
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLPNORM D ST LANDAU ESQ1500 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | OPHTHALMOSCOPES, OPTICAL DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR THE VISUALIZATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF THE RETINA AND FOR THE VISUALIZATION OF THE RETINA FOR DETECTION AND MANAGEMENT OF EYE DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC OPHTHALMIC APPARATUS FOR THE VISUALIZATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF THE RETINA AND FOR THE VISUALIZATION OF THE RETINA FOR DETECTION AND MANAGEMENT OF EYE DISEASE; PARTS AND FITTINGS THEREOF | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | CARTOON STRIPS; PICTURES; POSTERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY T-SHIRTS, TRACK SUITS, TROUSERS, JACKETS, JEANS, JUMPERS, SWEATERS, SHIRTS, SLEEP WEAR; FOOTWEAR, NAMELY SHOES, TRAINERS; HEADGEAR, NAMELY HATS, CAPS | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | GAMES AND PLAYTHINGS, NAMELY, BOARD GAMES, CARD GAMES, MANIPULATIVE GAMES, ELECTRIC ACTION TOYS, MECHANICAL ACTION TOYS, BENDABLE TOYS, BATH TOYS, FANTASY CHARACTER TOYS, SOFT SCULPTURE TOYS, SQUEEZABLE SQUEAKING TOYS, STUFFED TOYS, PLUSH TOYS AND WIND UP TOYS | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | MEDICAL SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF OPTICAL AND OPHTHALMIC DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES; AND CONSULTATION RELATED THERETO | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Optos plc
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named O
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |