Drawing for NEURAY

USPTO serial 76475291

NEURAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEURAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan M. Mulholland

SUSAN M MULHOLLAND GESMER UPDEGROVE LLP40 BROAD STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for performing computer graphics operations and image rendering, together with instructional manuals and printed instructional and teaching guides sold therewith as a unitACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 28, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 19, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 19, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 21, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 21, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 7, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 1, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 1, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 1, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 1, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 9, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 25, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 11, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 11, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 11, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 29, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 9, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 30, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 29, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance