USPTO serial 76476197
AUTOGRAPH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AUTOGRAPH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
University Corporation for Advanced Internet Development
Washington, DC
Other trademarks owned by University Corporation for Advanced Internet Development
University Corporation for Advanced Internet Development
Washington, DC
Other trademarks owned by University Corporation for Advanced Internet Development
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jody H. Drake
JODY H DRAKE SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR PRIVACY MANAGEMENT IN ACCESSING ONLINE INFORMATION OR SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by University Corporation for Advanced Internet Development
- Other trademarks owned by University Corporation for Advanced Internet Development
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named AUTOGRAPH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 24, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |