USPTO serial 76476330
ILEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3823450Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 27, 2010
- Examiner
- GENOVESE, CARRIE A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ILEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MEDCON BIOLAB TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
GRAFTON, MA
Grafton, MA
Grafton, MA
Grafton, MA
NORTHAMTPTON, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michele P. Schwartz
JOHN W. PATTON K&L GATES, LLP1717 MAIN STREET, SUITE 2800DALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Medicated skin care preparations, namely, skin paste for use by ostomy patients to protect the stomal region of the body and medicated skin paste for the treatment of diaper rash | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1979 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MEDCON BIOLAB TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Medcon Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Medcon Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Medcon Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by OAKMED DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named ILEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 11, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |