Drawing for LIVE SPEECH MAPPING

USPTO serial 76476587

LIVE SPEECH MAPPING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIVE SPEECH MAPPING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arthur W. Fisher, III

ARTHUR W FISHER III ARTHUR W FISHER III PA5553 W WATERS AVE STE 316TAMPA, FL 33634-1210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010a medical system comprising a real time diagnostic and prescriptive procedure to evaluate the dynamic range of hearing of an individual patient in order to fit a hearing aid device to the particular needs of the individual patientACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 11, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 10, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 4, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 21, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 21, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance