USPTO serial 76476967
Serial No. 76476967
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRODY, DANIEL S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 76476967?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph R. Dreitler
Joseph R. Dreitler Bricker & Eckler LLP100 S. Third St.Columbus, OH 43215UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | production and distribution of motion pictures and documentaries; script writing services; audio recording and production of music; conducting entertainment exhibitions in the nature of film festivals and organizing and conducting entertainment exhibitions in the field of film technology; conducting award ceremonies to promote excellence in the entertainment industry; entertainment in the nature of television shows and documentaries in the fields of action/adventure, comedy, crime, drama, horror, musicals, science fiction, war, westerns, soap operas, martial arts, sports, news, and game shows; entertainment in the nature of live and on-line musical performances, film festivals, and fashion shows; providing on-line computer games; entertainment in the nature of visual and audio performances, dance performances, amusement park shows, and theatre productions; entertainment services, namely providing a web site featuring musical performances, musical videos, photographs, movies, live-actions, comedies, dramas, related film clips, and other multimedia materials, and related reviews; entertainment services, namely live, televised and movie appearances by professional entertainers, movie stars, singers, and sports celebrities; entertainment services, namely providing television programs in the fields of movies, live-actions, comedies, and dramas via a global computer network; entertainment services, namely providing on-line reviews of movies, live-actions, comedies, dramas, books, music and computer games; arranging ticket reservations for shows and other entertainment events; educational and entertainment services, namely providing motivational and educational speakers; entertainment in the nature of competitions in the fields of films, television shows, television series, music, fashion, sports, animation shows, dance, theatre productions, and on-line computer games; entertainment services, namely providing prerecorded music, information in the field of music, and commentary and articles about music, all on-line via a global computer network and electronic global communications network; entertainment, namely live performances by musical bands; entertainment, namely live music concerts; radio entertainment production; entertainment services, namely providing radio programs, television programs, and conducting contests and festivals in the fields of music, film, sports, animation, and audio and visual shows via a global computer network; entertainment services, namely conducting contests on board cruise ships for passengers of all ages, in function rooms, stadiums, exhibition centers, concert halls, parks, or shopping malls; radio entertainment services, namely radio programs featuring performances by fictional characters, radio or sports or movie or games personalities, professional entertainers, movie stars, singers or sports celebrities; movie studios; movie theatres; and production of radio and television programs; animation production services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 24, 2008 | PCBD | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - DENIED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 15, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 11, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 23, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |