USPTO serial 76477087
GLASSPAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GLASSPAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
JACKSONVILLE, FL
ORMOND BEACH, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARTHUR G. YEAGER
ARTHUR G YEAGER ARTHUR G YEAGER PA245-1 E ADAMS STJACKSONVILLE, FL 32202-3336UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | FIBER GLASS FOUNDATIONS FOR SUPPORTING ENCLOSURES FOR COVERING, SECURING, AND OTHERWISE PROTECTING EXTERIOR PLUMBING ASSEMBLIES | ACTIVE | Oct 25, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |