USPTO serial 76477097
GLACIER PEAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GLACIER PEAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Little Rock, AR
Little Rock, AR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SIMOR L MOSKOWITZ
SIMOR L MOSKOWITZ JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLCTHE JENIFER BLDG 400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | SPORTS BAGS, NAMELY, DUFFEL BAGS, BACKPACKS, GYM BAGS; TRAVEL BAGS; TRAVEL TOILETRY BAGS SOLD EMPTY; TRAVEL UMBRELLAS; STRAPS FOR LUGGAGE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 18, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 18, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |