USPTO serial 76477443
WRIGHT.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 22, 2004
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WRIGHT.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
Arlington, TN
Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
Arlington, TN
Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
Arlington, TN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Samuel W. Apicelli / Christiane S. Campbell
Samuel W. Apicelli / Christiane S. Campbell Duane Morris LLP30 South 17th StreetPhiladelphia, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | MEDICAL APPARATUS, NAMELY ORTHOPEDIC JOINT IMPLANTS AND INSTRUMENTATION THEREFOR | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named WRIGHT.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 30, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |