USPTO serial 76477549
ROLLERBURGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROLLERBURGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neal L. Slifkin
HOME MARKET FOODS INC140 MORGAN DRNORWOOD, MA 02062-5013UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed meat, namely, beef, chicken and pork | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | RGEX | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | RFRR | REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 31, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 20, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |