USPTO serial 76478032
DEL VALLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEL VALLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cristina A. Carvalho
Cristina A. Carvalho Arent Fox LLP1050 Connecticut Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | mineral and aerated waters; non-alcoholic malt coolers, nonalcoholic punch; fruit flavored soft drinks; fruit flavored drinks; soft drinks; sport drinks; fruit drinks and fruit juices; concentrates, syrups and powders used in the preparation of soft drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |