USPTO serial 76478063
MAC'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 13, 2005
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAC'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Laval Quebec, CA
Laval Quebec, CA
Laval, Quebec, H7L 0E3, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent E. Routman
Brent E. Routman Merchant & Gould P.C.P.O. Box 2019Minneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail grocery and convenience store services and retail gasoline outlet stores | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ALIMENTATION COUCHE-TARD INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ALIMENTATION COUCHE-TARD INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ALIMENTATION COUCHE-TARD INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named MAC'S
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 13, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 3, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 3, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2012 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 8, 2012 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CU.G | CONCURRENT USE GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |