USPTO serial 76478497
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. Gregory Schivley
Burton S. Ehrlich Ladas & Parry LLP224 S. Michigan AvenueSuite 1600Chicago, IL 60604| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and programs for recovering data on computer data storage devices after the occurrence of electrical or mechanical failure, computer operator errors, software malfunctions, computer viruses and computer crimes; computer software and programs for recovering and/or analyzing data on computer data storage devices for purposes of detecting, recovering and securing computer data evidence; computer operating programs; downloadable computer software for recovering data on computer data storage devices after the occurrence of electrical or mechanical failure, computer operator errors, software malfunctions, computer viruses and computer crimes; computers; computer memories; floppy disks featuring computer software and programs for recovering data on computer data storage devices after the occurrence of electrical or mechanical failure, computer operator errors, software malfunctions, computer viruses and computer crimes; CD-ROMs featuring computer software and programs for recovering data on computer data storage devices after the occurrence of electrical or mechanical failure, computer operator errors, software malfunctions, computer viruses and computer crimes | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Feb 29, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2009 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 22, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |