Drawing for DATAROBOT

USPTO serial 76478497

DATAROBOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2920150Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 18, 2005
Examiner
SLOAN, CYNTHIA
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DATAROBOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. Gregory Schivley

Burton S. Ehrlich Ladas & Parry LLP224 S. Michigan AvenueSuite 1600Chicago, IL 60604

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and programs for recovering data on computer data storage devices after the occurrence of electrical or mechanical failure, computer operator errors, software malfunctions, computer viruses and computer crimes; computer software and programs for recovering and/or analyzing data on computer data storage devices for purposes of detecting, recovering and securing computer data evidence; computer operating programs; downloadable computer software for recovering data on computer data storage devices after the occurrence of electrical or mechanical failure, computer operator errors, software malfunctions, computer viruses and computer crimes; computers; computer memories; floppy disks featuring computer software and programs for recovering data on computer data storage devices after the occurrence of electrical or mechanical failure, computer operator errors, software malfunctions, computer viruses and computer crimes; CD-ROMs featuring computer software and programs for recovering data on computer data storage devices after the occurrence of electrical or mechanical failure, computer operator errors, software malfunctions, computer viruses and computer crimesSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDFeb 29, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 12, 2009C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Nov 12, 2009CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 29, 2009CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Jun 11, 2009PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 18, 2005R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Nov 22, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 22, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 3, 2004CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Nov 3, 2004IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Oct 8, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2004AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 20, 2004EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 18, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 31, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 30, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance