USPTO serial 76478505
PERFECTLY NATURAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PERFECTLY NATURAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan A. Richards, Esq.
SUSAN A RICHARDS ESQ MILES & STOCKBRIDGE PC1751 PINNACLE DR STE 500MCLEAN, VA 22102-3833UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Lawn and garden products and landscaping and horticulture products, homecare horticultural products, namely, soil conditioners, soil supplements, chemical compost accelerators, organic compost accelerators, fertilizers for agricultural or domestic use, mineral-based water cleansers, ph supplements for soil, and soil amendments | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | Herbicides and weed killers for agricultural or domestic use | ABANDONED | — |
| 044 | Lawn and garden care, horticultural and landscape gardening services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ceres Environmental Solutions Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ceres Environmental Solutions Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named PERFECTLY NATURAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |