USPTO serial 76478915
ALLIANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALLIANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mr. Alan Kasper
MR ALAN KASPER SUGHRUE, MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWSTE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | NON-ELECTRIC KITCHEN TOOLS, NAMELY, HAND-OPERATED CHOPPERS, SLICERS, DICERS, FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PEELERS AND CAN OPENERS; UTILITY FORKS AND KNIVES | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | COOKWARE, NAMELY, POTS AND PANS; BAKEWARE; OVENWARE, NAMELY, COOKIE SHEETS AND ROASTING PANS; UTENSILS, NAMELY, POT AND PAN SCRAPERS, ROLLING PINS, SPATULAS, TURNERS AND WHISKS; SALT AND PEPPER MILLS AND SHAKERS, SALAD SPINNERS, WOOD AND PLASTIC CHOPPING BOARDS AND BOTTLE OPENERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |