USPTO serial 76479310
AAA NETWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COGGINS, ROBERT H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AAA NETWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Falls Church, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul W. Richter
PAUL W RICHTER150 S WASHINGTON ST STE 400FALLS CHURCH, VA 22046-2921UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SELLS, INSTALLS AND CONFIGURES LOCAL AREA COMPUTER NETWORKS AND WIDE AREA COMPUTER NETWORKS FOR COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS USING CENTRAL COMPUTER NETWORKS SERVERS, SWITCHES AND ROUTERS THAT ARE -- MANUFACTURED BY OTHER COMPANIES, LINKED TO THE CUSTOMERS' COMPUTERS BY CABLES OR WIRELESS RADIO OR INFRA-RED COMMUNICATION; ALLOW THE CUSTOMERS NETWORKED COMPUTERS TO RECEIVE AND HARE DATA, COMPUTER FILES, TELEPHONES CALLS, E-MAIL TRANSMISSIONS, FACSIMILE TRANSMISSIONS AND IMAGES AND VIDEO FROM ONE ANOTHER AND FROM SOURCES OUTSIDE OF THE NETWORK | ACTIVE | Sep 4, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |