USPTO serial 76479323
MAXODERM (VASOTRAN AUCTUM) TOPICAL LOTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAXODERM (VASOTRAN AUCTUM) TOPICAL LOTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Staten Island, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher J. Hussin
LEW HANSEN SHERIDAN ROSS PC1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceuticals, namely, inducer of erection for males; adult sexual aids, namely, increases penis size, but also intensifies orgasms, prolongs erections, and enhances sexual stamina by a unique topical herbal blend to increase blood flow to the penis; herbal male enhancement formula; sexual performance enhancer via skin treatment | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | Adult sexual aids, namely, increases penis size, but also intensifies orgasms, prolongs erections, and enhances sexual stamina by a unique topical herbal blend to increase blood flow to the penis; herbal male enhancement formula; sexual performance enhancer via skin treatment; Pharmaceuticals, namely, inducer of erections for males | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | PRRD | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2004 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |